Migrationsrecht.net - Das Fachportal zum Ausländerrecht



Ausländerrecht arrow Deutschland arrow Citizenship and Nationality, concept and notion, Nottebohm, ICJ

Suche Ausländerrecht

altfallregelung aufenthaltstitel bleiberecht bleiberechtsregelung duldung einbürgerung immigration suchen suchen...


Citizenship and Nationality, concept and notion, Nottebohm, ICJ

PDF Drucken E-Mail
Geschrieben von Daniel Naujoks Freitag, 3. Juni 2005
Often the terms ‘nationality’ and ‘citizenship’ are used synonymously in the bulk of the economic, sociological and legal literature on this topic. In this context the notion is understood as a “legal bond having on its basis a social fact of attachment, a genuine connection of existence, interests and sentiments, together with the existence of reciprocal rights and duties” as defined the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in the famous Nottebohm decision from 1955. However, it may be worth noting that the underlying membership concepts are not always identical.
The idea of ‘citizenship’ traces back to the Greek city-states and means the membership to a political corporation of equal individuals. The term ‘nationality’ is ambiguous. On the one hand, ‘nationality’ is understood as the bond that ties a State to each of its members – thus, it means a political and legal membership and in so far it can be considered a synonym to citizenship. But in distinction to the old notion of ‘citizenship’, the idea of ‘nationality’ was developed in the nineteenth century and it is connected with the political theory of the nation-state. On the other hand, ‘nationality’ is a sociological concept, identifying the bonds between an individual and a nation, not a state. In this context, belonging to a nation is not due to legal norms but it results from a certain cultural unity, race, common language, beliefs of history and the wish for political self-determination. Event though there is no and there cannot be an exhaustive definition of nation but the mentioned criteria are often cited as examples for elements of a nation. Sometimes nationality is seen even more generally, as emotional attachment of members to a community.
 
Even in actual State practice, the terms ‘nationality’ and ‘citizenship’ are not always synonymous. Some Latin American countries confer an unbreakable bond of nationality to their born nationals while citizenship may be renounced and acquired elsewhere (e.g. Argentina, Panama and Venezuela).
Another often cited example is the distinction of citizens and nationals in the U.S.. According to Section 101(a)(22) INA all U.S. citizens are at the same time U.S. nationals but people born at American Samoa or Swains Island are American nationals without being U.S. citizens (Section 308 together with Section 101(A)(29) INA). They have a so called ‘non-citizen national status’.
Nonetheless, for the practical use of these terms it may be sufficient not do differentiate between ‘nationality’ and ‘citizenship’. It is however worth knowing the difference.
 
by Daniel Naujoks
 
Further Information:
 
 
by Prof Dr Günter Renner

Bookmarken Sie diese Seite:

These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. powered by moSociable 1.0.1 by www.waltercedric.com
  • mister wong
  • slashdot
  • del.icio.us
  • technorati
  • digg
  • Furl
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Reddit
  • Blinklist
  • Fark
  • Simpy
  • Spurl
  • NewsVine

< zurück   weiter >



Nutzer Login

Veranstaltungen

Kalender

News per RSS

International



Rechtsanwälte

Rechtsanwaltskanzlei Kugler, Cassel, Erbas

Rechtsanwaltskanzlei Kugler, Cassel, Erbas

eBooks

eBook rechts

Nomos Verlag

Nomos


Generated in 2.09925 Seconds